<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Where is China&#8217;s fast-track IDN?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2010/03/08/china-idn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2010/03/08/china-idn/</link> <description>Adventures in web and mobile globalization</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: ICANN approves IDNs for China, Taiwan, Thailand, Sri Lanka&#8230; &#124; Global by Design</title><link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2010/03/08/china-idn/comment-page-1/#comment-40325</link> <dc:creator>ICANN approves IDNs for China, Taiwan, Thailand, Sri Lanka&#8230; &#124; Global by Design</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 17:58:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalbydesign.com/?p=1922#comment-40325</guid> <description>[...] A few weeks back I asked Where is China&#8217;s IDN? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few weeks back I asked Where is China&#8217;s IDN? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: idnguy</title><link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2010/03/08/china-idn/comment-page-1/#comment-39367</link> <dc:creator>idnguy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:39:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalbydesign.com/?p=1922#comment-39367</guid> <description>My suspicion is that they are fighting over the issue of having both traditional and simplified versions delegated.  ICANN isn&#039;t prepared to do that yet as they don&#039;t feel that they&#039;ve worked through the technical issues yet.
My sources tell me that CNNIC will go ahead with one variant, rather than wait for ICANN to allow them to delegate both.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My suspicion is that they are fighting over the issue of having both traditional and simplified versions delegated.  ICANN isn&#8217;t prepared to do that yet as they don&#8217;t feel that they&#8217;ve worked through the technical issues yet.</p><p>My sources tell me that CNNIC will go ahead with one variant, rather than wait for ICANN to allow them to delegate both.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 443/446 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalbydesign.com @ 2012-02-08 22:20:04 -->
