<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minimalism in global gateways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2009/11/18/minimalism-in-global-gateways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2009/11/18/minimalism-in-global-gateways/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Web Globalization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal Boleslav Měchura</title>
		<link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2009/11/18/minimalism-in-global-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-34629</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Boleslav Měchura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalbydesign.com/?p=2394#comment-34629</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy to design a minimalistic gateway if your language support is also minimalistic -- namely, just two languages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy to design a minimalistic gateway if your language support is also minimalistic &#8212; namely, just two languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Yunker</title>
		<link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2009/11/18/minimalism-in-global-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-34456</link>
		<dc:creator>John Yunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalbydesign.com/?p=2394#comment-34456</guid>
		<description>Language negotiation is very useful and I often recommend it as well, but it too has its flaws. You always need some visual gateway in the event the user is traveling, on a different computer, etc. 

Also, to prevent users from hitting this page repeatedly, many sites simply use cookies to capture the language preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Language negotiation is very useful and I often recommend it as well, but it too has its flaws. You always need some visual gateway in the event the user is traveling, on a different computer, etc. </p>
<p>Also, to prevent users from hitting this page repeatedly, many sites simply use cookies to capture the language preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar Bittersmann</title>
		<link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2009/11/18/minimalism-in-global-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-34446</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar Bittersmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalbydesign.com/?p=2394#comment-34446</guid>
		<description>Simple? Not really.

Simple for the user would be no such page at all.

“Unfortunately, some sites always return this special page (for the home page) instead of implementing language negotiation. This forces everyone to always go through that page while offering no apparent advantage. Bad human factors design.” [link]http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-when-lang-neg[/link]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple? Not really.</p>
<p>Simple for the user would be no such page at all.</p>
<p>“Unfortunately, some sites always return this special page (for the home page) instead of implementing language negotiation. This forces everyone to always go through that page while offering no apparent advantage. Bad human factors design.” [link]http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-when-lang-neg[/link]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
