<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Book is Flat: A Review of &#8220;The World is Flat&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2005/04/28/the-book-is-flat-a-review-of-the-world-is-flat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2005/04/28/the-book-is-flat-a-review-of-the-world-is-flat/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Web Globalization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Sarkar</title>
		<link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2005/04/28/the-book-is-flat-a-review-of-the-world-is-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Sarkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 04:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalbydesign.com/2005/04/28/the-book-is-flat-a-review-of-the-world-is-flat/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>See Friedman&#039;s recent op-ed piece: &#039;What, Me Worry?&#039; http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/29/opinion/29friedman.html

Here&#039;s a snippet&gt;

&quot;For the first time in our history, we are going to face competition from low-wage, high-human-capital communities, embedded within India, China and Asia,&quot; President Lawrence Summers of Harvard told me. In order to thrive, &quot;it will not be enough for us to just leave no child behind. We also have to make sure that many more young Americans can get as far ahead as their potential will take them. How we meet this challenge is what will define our nation&#039;s political economy for the next several decades.&quot;

Indeed, we can&#039;t rely on importing the talent we need anymore - not in a flat world where people can now innovate without having to emigrate. In Silicon Valley today, &quot;B to B&quot; and &quot;B to C&quot; stand for &quot;back to Bangalore&quot; and &quot;back to China,&quot; which is where a lot of our foreign talent is moving. 

Meeting this challenge requires a set of big ideas. If you want to grasp some of what is required, check out a smart new book by the strategists John Hagel III and John Seely Brown entitled &quot;The Only Sustainable Edge.&quot; They argue that comparative advantage today is moving faster than ever from structural factors, like natural resources, to how quickly a country builds its distinctive talents for innovation and entrepreneurship - the only sustainable edge.

Economics is not like war. It can always be win-win. &quot;But some win more than others,&quot; Mr. Hagel said, and today it will be those countries that are best and fastest at building, attracting and holding talent. 

There is a real sense of urgency in India and China about &quot;catching up&quot; in talent-building. America, by contrast, has become rather complacent. &quot;People go to Shanghai or Bangalore and they look around and say, &#039;They&#039;re still way behind us,&#039; &quot; Mr. Hagel said. &quot;But it&#039;s not just about current capabilities. It&#039;s about the relative pace and trajectories of capability-building. 

&quot;You have to look at where Shanghai was just three years ago, see where it is today and then extrapolate forward. Compare the pace and trajectory of talent-building within their population and businesses and the pace and trajectory here.&quot; 

India and China know they can&#039;t just depend on low wages, so they are racing us to the top, not the bottom. Producing a comprehensive U.S. response - encompassing immigration, intellectual property law and educational policy - to focus on developing our talent in a flat world is a big idea worthy of a presidency. But it would also require Mr. Bush to do something he has never done: ask Americans to do something hard. 

---snip&gt;

Hagel and Seely Brown have set up their own site: http://www.edgeperspectives.com 
and a blog:
http://www.edgeperspectives.typepad.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Friedman&#8217;s recent op-ed piece: &#8216;What, Me Worry?&#8217; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/29/opinion/29friedman.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/29/opinion/29friedman.html</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a snippet&gt;</p>
<p>&#8220;For the first time in our history, we are going to face competition from low-wage, high-human-capital communities, embedded within India, China and Asia,&#8221; President Lawrence Summers of Harvard told me. In order to thrive, &#8220;it will not be enough for us to just leave no child behind. We also have to make sure that many more young Americans can get as far ahead as their potential will take them. How we meet this challenge is what will define our nation&#8217;s political economy for the next several decades.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed, we can&#8217;t rely on importing the talent we need anymore &#8211; not in a flat world where people can now innovate without having to emigrate. In Silicon Valley today, &#8220;B to B&#8221; and &#8220;B to C&#8221; stand for &#8220;back to Bangalore&#8221; and &#8220;back to China,&#8221; which is where a lot of our foreign talent is moving. </p>
<p>Meeting this challenge requires a set of big ideas. If you want to grasp some of what is required, check out a smart new book by the strategists John Hagel III and John Seely Brown entitled &#8220;The Only Sustainable Edge.&#8221; They argue that comparative advantage today is moving faster than ever from structural factors, like natural resources, to how quickly a country builds its distinctive talents for innovation and entrepreneurship &#8211; the only sustainable edge.</p>
<p>Economics is not like war. It can always be win-win. &#8220;But some win more than others,&#8221; Mr. Hagel said, and today it will be those countries that are best and fastest at building, attracting and holding talent. </p>
<p>There is a real sense of urgency in India and China about &#8220;catching up&#8221; in talent-building. America, by contrast, has become rather complacent. &#8220;People go to Shanghai or Bangalore and they look around and say, &#8216;They&#8217;re still way behind us,&#8217; &#8221; Mr. Hagel said. &#8220;But it&#8217;s not just about current capabilities. It&#8217;s about the relative pace and trajectories of capability-building. </p>
<p>&#8220;You have to look at where Shanghai was just three years ago, see where it is today and then extrapolate forward. Compare the pace and trajectory of talent-building within their population and businesses and the pace and trajectory here.&#8221; </p>
<p>India and China know they can&#8217;t just depend on low wages, so they are racing us to the top, not the bottom. Producing a comprehensive U.S. response &#8211; encompassing immigration, intellectual property law and educational policy &#8211; to focus on developing our talent in a flat world is a big idea worthy of a presidency. But it would also require Mr. Bush to do something he has never done: ask Americans to do something hard. </p>
<p>&#8212;snip&gt;</p>
<p>Hagel and Seely Brown have set up their own site: <a href="http://www.edgeperspectives.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.edgeperspectives.com</a><br />
and a blog:<br />
<a href="http://www.edgeperspectives.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.edgeperspectives.typepad.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
